Why the "official" rebuild estimate often isn't the whole picture.
When you file a property claim, your insurer doesn't guess your rebuild cost.
They typically run everything through a carrier-focused estimating system that:
On paper, it looks neutral and data-driven.
In practice, it can produce estimates that don't always match current, local rebuild costs—especially after major disasters.
The pricing data behind many estimates may be influenced by:
Contractors see the disconnect every day:
The system's "standard" price
What the software suggests a task should cost
The actual cost on the ground
What it really costs to get the work done right now
Those two numbers are often very different—especially in high-value, custom homes.
When the rebuild estimate is built on this system, most homeowners are facing:
The number on paper isn't enough to rebuild as-was
Scope arguments, supplements, and back-and-forth drag on
Dipping into savings, loans, or downsizing the rebuild
Some families walk away or accept a smaller, compromised home
And if they want help, the typical options are:
They can add value—but they often charge 8–15% of total recovery, and the process is still slow, opaque, and stressful.
The net result:
The system is highly optimized—for carriers.
Not for families.
In the wake of catastrophes like wildfires or regional disasters:
But the estimating systems used for many claims:
So the bigger and more complex your rebuild is, the more dangerous it is to rely on that "standard" number.
Despite billions of dollars in underpaid claims each year, there has been no scalable, homeowner-centric solution to:
Until now, your choices have been:
ClaimArchitect exists to change that.
ClaimArchitect doesn't control the carrier's system.
What we do is build a parallel system for homeowners:
Instead of relying entirely on a number generated for the carrier, you have a second, independent rebuild valuation built to protect you.
If you're looking at a rebuild estimate and thinking, "There's no way this is enough to rebuild what we had," you're probably right to question it.
You can:
Or you can put a dedicated system to work for you: